Submitted by Anonymous on 25 October 2006 - 11:52pm.
First, I want to thank you for posting my article. I have posted a responce to your comments you made concerning my other article titled fascist tolerance:Fascist Tolerance Two…
By, Chuck Jines
Earlier this month, I posted an article titled Fascist Tolerance, that highlighted the acts of violence, that have been committed by liberals upon conservatives. I used national examples that have repeadly occurred, such as the recent incident at Columbia University, as well as my own personal experiences of vandalism that have happened to my car due to my Bush bumper sticker. I explained in the article that the cause of this social phenomenon was due to the liberals’ frustration at their inability to win in the arena of ideas through rational debate and dialogue. I use the phrase “social phenomenon” because this pattern of intolerance is far more that just a few isolated incidents, but rather part of a persistent and frequent surge of unofficial persecution and discrimination. It is a symptom of a subtle, all-pervasive demand for egalitarian conformity. For an in-depth analysis I would highly recommend reading Eric Voegelin’s enlightening book titled The New Science of Politics, or Ken Wilber’s Sex, Ecology and Spirituality. You can access both of these great thinkers’ web sites by going to my links list.
In response to my original article, a comment was posted that provides a wonderful opportunity to further illustrate the legitimacy of the charges in my first article.
The comment was posted by a gentleman who goes by the name of “Treesong,” who stated the following: “It never ceases to amaze me that a political movement that controls all three branches of government and the news media can play the victim.”
Treesong has confessed that he is confused, by making the statement “never ceases to amaze me.” I will do my best to help the poor boy out by going real slow, for him and any other liberals who might be lost in an ocean of relativity.
Here is how one can “play” the victim: 1) If someone takes a key and scrapes it down the side of your car because they do not like your bumper sticker, it’s not hard to “play” the victim. 2) If someone mule-kicks a dent in the back of your car because they don’t like your bumper sticker, it’s not hard to “play” the victim. 3) If someone spits a big green hocker on your window while uttering profanities because they don’t like your bumper sticker, it’s not hard to “play” the victim. 4) If someone decides to smear veggie burger on your windshield because they don’t like your bumper sticker, it’s not hard to “play” the victim. 5) If someone decides to leave messages under your windshield wiper claiming that you are a “Nazi” or “baby killer,” it’s not hard to “play” the victim. 6) If you have been asked to give a talk at a university, and people choose to yell and scream so you cannot be heard, it’s not hard to “play” the victim. 7) If you have been asked to speak at a university, and someone chooses to smack you in the face with an object, it’s not hard to “play” the victim. 8) If you have been invited to speak at a university, and people choose to scream, yell, charge the stage, tear down the podium, and intimidate the guest speakers with physical violence, it’s not hard to “play” the victim. 9) If it is voting day, and a retirement center in Minnesota discovers that 30 of their transport vans have had their tires slashed in an attempt to prevent them from voting, it’s not hard to “play” the victim. 10) If you take the time to write about the acts of vandalism you have experienced due to a bumper sticker, and a deluded liberal submits a comment that tolerates, even justifies such acts of fascism, it’s not hard to “play” the victim. A quote from Treesong, “If Liberals do get irrational sometimes, it’s probably because of the conservatives…”
I stand by my original propositions that liberals are only tolerant of those who agree with them. Liberals will attempt to justify their intolerable acts of violence rather than come clean about there being a problem with their own thinking. Their philosophy of radical egalitarianism is founded not upon rational reasoning, but upon emotion. Treesong, like most radical liberals, is living in a self-created world of delusion that is incapable of dealing with reality in a rational manner. His own words prove my point. He indeed subscribes to and justifies Fascist Tolerance.
As a side note, I once read the following statement written on the bathroom wall of a local coffee house, the same coffee house where my car was repeatedly vandalized. I think it clearly highlights my point. “Ann Coulter needs to be taken out back and shot in the head because that’s what you have to do to fascists.” The message was signed, “Liberal Warrior.” For the best interest of all, may more rational minds prevail.
First, I want to thank you
First, I want to thank you for posting my article. I have posted a responce to your comments you made concerning my other article titled fascist tolerance:Fascist Tolerance Two…
By, Chuck Jines
Earlier this month, I posted an article titled Fascist Tolerance, that highlighted the acts of violence, that have been committed by liberals upon conservatives. I used national examples that have repeadly occurred, such as the recent incident at Columbia University, as well as my own personal experiences of vandalism that have happened to my car due to my Bush bumper sticker. I explained in the article that the cause of this social phenomenon was due to the liberals’ frustration at their inability to win in the arena of ideas through rational debate and dialogue. I use the phrase “social phenomenon” because this pattern of intolerance is far more that just a few isolated incidents, but rather part of a persistent and frequent surge of unofficial persecution and discrimination. It is a symptom of a subtle, all-pervasive demand for egalitarian conformity. For an in-depth analysis I would highly recommend reading Eric Voegelin’s enlightening book titled The New Science of Politics, or Ken Wilber’s Sex, Ecology and Spirituality. You can access both of these great thinkers’ web sites by going to my links list.
In response to my original article, a comment was posted that provides a wonderful opportunity to further illustrate the legitimacy of the charges in my first article.
The comment was posted by a gentleman who goes by the name of “Treesong,” who stated the following: “It never ceases to amaze me that a political movement that controls all three branches of government and the news media can play the victim.”
Treesong has confessed that he is confused, by making the statement “never ceases to amaze me.” I will do my best to help the poor boy out by going real slow, for him and any other liberals who might be lost in an ocean of relativity.
Here is how one can “play” the victim: 1) If someone takes a key and scrapes it down the side of your car because they do not like your bumper sticker, it’s not hard to “play” the victim. 2) If someone mule-kicks a dent in the back of your car because they don’t like your bumper sticker, it’s not hard to “play” the victim. 3) If someone spits a big green hocker on your window while uttering profanities because they don’t like your bumper sticker, it’s not hard to “play” the victim. 4) If someone decides to smear veggie burger on your windshield because they don’t like your bumper sticker, it’s not hard to “play” the victim. 5) If someone decides to leave messages under your windshield wiper claiming that you are a “Nazi” or “baby killer,” it’s not hard to “play” the victim. 6) If you have been asked to give a talk at a university, and people choose to yell and scream so you cannot be heard, it’s not hard to “play” the victim. 7) If you have been asked to speak at a university, and someone chooses to smack you in the face with an object, it’s not hard to “play” the victim. 8) If you have been invited to speak at a university, and people choose to scream, yell, charge the stage, tear down the podium, and intimidate the guest speakers with physical violence, it’s not hard to “play” the victim. 9) If it is voting day, and a retirement center in Minnesota discovers that 30 of their transport vans have had their tires slashed in an attempt to prevent them from voting, it’s not hard to “play” the victim. 10) If you take the time to write about the acts of vandalism you have experienced due to a bumper sticker, and a deluded liberal submits a comment that tolerates, even justifies such acts of fascism, it’s not hard to “play” the victim. A quote from Treesong, “If Liberals do get irrational sometimes, it’s probably because of the conservatives…”
I stand by my original propositions that liberals are only tolerant of those who agree with them. Liberals will attempt to justify their intolerable acts of violence rather than come clean about there being a problem with their own thinking. Their philosophy of radical egalitarianism is founded not upon rational reasoning, but upon emotion. Treesong, like most radical liberals, is living in a self-created world of delusion that is incapable of dealing with reality in a rational manner. His own words prove my point. He indeed subscribes to and justifies Fascist Tolerance.
As a side note, I once read the following statement written on the bathroom wall of a local coffee house, the same coffee house where my car was repeatedly vandalized. I think it clearly highlights my point. “Ann Coulter needs to be taken out back and shot in the head because that’s what you have to do to fascists.” The message was signed, “Liberal Warrior.” For the best interest of all, may more rational minds prevail.