Submitted by Rachel Fischoff (not verified) on 31 July 2007 - 10:14pm.
You have a sprite mind, a good heart and common sense, Treesong.
Yet, one thing troubles me: Using the title, "Forbidden Philosophies" seems a bit risky in this ever-changing ya-ha media climate.
First, it dangerously sounds like the topic is rationalizations for kinky sex or Area 51 true believers.
Second, "Forbidden," is that accurate? Aren't these ideas openly discussed in many arenas? Isn't this type of thinking gaining acceptance? If this type of philosophy is highlighted frequently in the New York Times, how underground can it be?
Third, Scary titles scare away new people.
I understand the important allure of a spicy title; I just don't think this is the right spicy title now.
And I would hate to see the attendance numbers low because the banner was misinterpreted.
Resuming Public Speaking: my reply to your reply to my reply
You have a sprite mind, a good heart and common sense, Treesong.
Yet, one thing troubles me: Using the title, "Forbidden Philosophies" seems a bit risky in this ever-changing ya-ha media climate.
First, it dangerously sounds like the topic is rationalizations for kinky sex or Area 51 true believers.
Second, "Forbidden," is that accurate? Aren't these ideas openly discussed in many arenas? Isn't this type of thinking gaining acceptance? If this type of philosophy is highlighted frequently in the New York Times, how underground can it be?
Third, Scary titles scare away new people.
I understand the important allure of a spicy title; I just don't think this is the right spicy title now.
And I would hate to see the attendance numbers low because the banner was misinterpreted.
Best wishes,
Rachel Fischoff